College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Graduate walkout dead, replaced with Mall event

By Shain Bergan

|

Published: Friday, September 18, 2009

Updated: Monday, September 21, 2009

Grad Rally

Emily Jones/Arizona Daily Wildcat

After several days of speculation, UA graduate students will band together on Thursday to express their displeasure over university budget cuts.

The UA graduate student community has been weighing its options since the Graduate and Professional Student Council meeting last week. One of the options that gained rapid attention was a possible walkout meant to mirror a similar walkout within the University of California school system that will take place Thursday at noon.

While the graduate students will not be staging a walkout this week, they will instead take to the UA Mall on Sept. 24 from about 12:15 p.m. to 1 p.m.

“We’re trying to get it on the stage,” said geography doctoral student Jen McCormack, an organizer of Thursday’s event. “This isn’t just a student movement. We’re trying to create a community concept.”

Organizers stressed that the event will involve faculty and students talking about how university cuts will affect them and is not meant to be reactionary or hostile.

“We want it to be a positive, informative event,” McCormack said. “There seem to be quite a few people on campus who don’t know what is going on.”

The announcement of the event comes on the heels of President Robert Shelton accepting a sit-down meeting with graduate leadership. The meeting will take place today in the Regents Room of the Administration Building at 4 p.m.

The meeting is open to anyone, and GPSC President David Talenfeld said he expects a high turnout.

The GPSC meeting with Shelton was granted after the graduate student government sent a letter to the president last week.

The letter outlined three priorities, including tuition remission for Graduate Assistants in Teaching, no reduction in GAT health care benefits and the creation of a Graduate Student Bill of Rights.

Talenfeld said that although he agrees with advancing the graduate student agenda, all parties involved should keep in mind that the current budget crunch just does not allow the university to run as it used to.

“There is simply not enough money to maintain the status quo,” he said. “Unfortunately, everyone has to make sacrifices.”

A potential walkout had seemed to be gaining ground among the graduate student community late last week.

More than 50 graduate students and teaching assistants gathered outside of Old Main on Sept. 18 to stress their disapproval of budget actions taken by the UA’s upper administration.

Graduate students at Old Main suggested a possible walkout set for Sept. 24 around noon, during which graduate TAs would gather as a collective voice of opposition on the UA Mall, either on the west platform or the cactus garden in front of the Administration Building.

The purpose of the demonstration would be to “put a stick in the beehive” to attract the attention of Shelton and Provost Meredith Hay, said Conor Cash, a masters student in geography and co-organizer of the gathering outside of Old Main.

The group largely expressed that a walkout would have to include most of the graduate student community for the administration to take them seriously and not charge the teaching assistants with violating their contracts.

While Talenfeld understands the concerns of his constituents, he was not in favor of a graduate student walkout.

“It hasn’t been discussed formally with the council,” he said. “(Teaching assistants) take a certain risk by being insubordinate in not showing up for work.”

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

16 comments

Stephen Bieda III (GPSC President Alumnus 2008-2009)
Mon Sep 21 2009 16:50
Watching the Social Sciences and Liberal Arts attacking the Sciences and vice versa is far from productive. The University is faced with continued budget cuts that each year is in the 10's of millions of dollars and, when adjusted for inflation, the University has not seen a budget increase at all. Rather than attacking one another, it would serve all involved best if a unified list of "demands" is formed so that the graduate and professional students can decide where to direct their grievances. An unorganized and unprepared protest/walkout will cause more harm than good if the aforementioned action is not taken.
E W D
Mon Sep 21 2009 16:37
You people are all spoiled. Everyone needs to tighten their belts. As for differential cuts, why don't we put it to an hourly rate. The sciences work harder, longer, and to greater economic benefit than the coffee house philosophers that have the time and energy to waste at a protest. Do something productive to dig us out of this hole besides complain about reality.
Right On Grad Students
Mon Sep 21 2009 16:27
I would like to point out that nobody here has addressed the real issue Crusader is trying to get at. Just so you're aware, there are differential cuts 7% to the social sciences and humanities, 2% to the sciences. These differential cuts are a blatent attempt by the current university administration to divide the campus community and are placing a biased value judgement on the social sciences, which they consider unimportant.
Deimos Phobos
Mon Sep 21 2009 12:56
Those of us associated with Mars and Mirrors would disagree with the sign.
disappointed
Mon Sep 21 2009 04:24
not surprised about the wildcat's biased misrepresentation, even the new title of this rewrite article is belittling in nature.
domestic_partner
Mon Sep 21 2009 03:57
Thank God I moved out of Arizona! I am still finishing my PhD dissertation at a UA department, but I now live in Washington state. My domestic partner works at a Catholic hospital here, and I am covered on her health insurance plan: no questions asked. Jan Brewer is a bigot and a fool, and history will remember both her and the state of Arizona as regressive and mean-spirited. It is sad, since I know many good progressive Arizonans. Perhaps they should consider joining us up here in the Northwest. Let Arizona rot.
Andie
Sun Sep 20 2009 22:46
Ooooooh okay. Appreciate the help!
Linguist
Sun Sep 20 2009 21:50
Crusader, you accuse us of complaining about effects on the whole university, telling us we should point out differences in cuts (even though our goal is to unite across these differences) but then accuse us also of focussing on harm to grads and not to undergrads. You can't have it both ways. In fact, we are horrified at what's happening in Centennial. We are educators. How could we not be? It baffles the mind how you extracted a "selfish" complaint out of our message of unity across the U of A. Not even the reporter misrepresented us that badly.
Brittany Davis
Sun Sep 20 2009 21:40
Andie, they changed the story. The article published on Friday had the headline "Graduate student walkout gains momentum", and inaccurately said that those at the meeting were enthusiastic about having a walkout. Those misquoted and others from the meeting then expressed their grievances to the article's author, which led to today's update to the article, which is more of a rewrite than an update. Much of the original content in the article, where speakers were misquoted and the decisions reached misstated, has now been deleted.
Andie
Sun Sep 20 2009 21:09
I don't understand the first two comments. it clearly states that they decided NOT to hold a walkout. so why are you claiming that it didn't say that? it's right there. I'm reading it. It's in the headline. Did they since then change the story or did you just not read it carefully?
grad student
Sat Sep 19 2009 18:53
Crusader, the question is not simply one of "everybody suffering in a recession", but how are we going to get out of this recession, and what are we willing to sacrifice in the process? If you don't think that education and the university have an important role to play in moving this state forward, perhaps you shouldn't be here, investing in your future. If you do, then now is the time to start organizing with your fellow students and all those affected by these cuts to defend public education, and to prevent further dramatic cuts that will lead to more layoffs, more tuition hikes, more overstuffed classes, and fewer opportunities for students and graduates.
jared
Sat Sep 19 2009 17:15
"Crusader": You were obviously not at the "protest" yesterday or else you might know "why there is all this ruckus." Perhaps that is a little "selfish" on your part? Unfortunately our efforts to present "evidence that certain people are getting more while [certain others] are receiving less" will likely be lost on you as you have already demonstrated your unwillingness to actually investigate the event you are so quick to criticize, and your allegiance to the University-as-Corporation model being pushed through behind closed doors.

I wonder: if a professor took your term paper, crossed out your name and put someone else's on it, and subsequently gave you a failing grade, would you quit school and go work for WalMart? Sounds bunk to me.

Julie
Sat Sep 19 2009 16:42
Crusader: I think the point of the walkout was to protest the effects of budget cuts university-wide. The administration's quick decision to change course delivery in order to save money (e.g. holding huge classes in Centennial Hall, offering online instead of in-person classes, etc.) have an effect on the quality of scholarship at the university.

Furthermore, the allocation of funds in certain money-making areas (e.g. medicine) over non-profitable academic wings (e.g. humanities) is a *political* decision and it is *everyone's* responsibility to demand accountability from the administration for these decisions. While undergraduates receive degrees in one subject area, college education in the United States is primarily liberal arts focused, producing well-rounded critical thinkers. All departments on the college campus contribute to the education of undergraduate students. If the University of Arizona wants to transition into a vocational school, then the administration needs to be above-board about it with students, faculty and staff. If we're all doomed to be part of a University of Phoenix model, then I for one, want to have a voice in the process. U of Arizona is a public institution, and as such, the campus community must have a voice in its vision and direction.

Finally, graduate students, as low-wage, flexible, apprentice laborers at the university are uniquely vulnerable during difficult financial times and *should* use this opportunity to put systems in place to protect themselves.

Crusader
Sat Sep 19 2009 15:37
I'm kind of at a loss here. I understand how people could be upset about budget cuts but why do certain people feel the need to start protesting? Look, the economy is in "recession", tax revenues are down, endowments are probably down as well. The entire state, the country, everyone, is hurting for funds. So, please, if you can, tell me exactly why there is all this ruckus. All I get from this article and the following comments is that there is a negative effect on the university when there are budget cuts. Ok, what is the revelation in that? If you have some evidence that certain people are getting more while you are receiving less, please say so and bring that injustice to our attention. Otherwise, go sit in on that class offered in Centennial Hall and realize that the grad students, etc are not the only ones being jipped by a bad economy. Simply put, I think your argument is bunk and a little selfish. If you're pissed off about your situation, how about going to work for a corporation that continues to post growth despite the recession(i.e. Wal-Mart, Delloite)? Please clarify these things for me if anyone else reads this.
Brittany Davis
Sat Sep 19 2009 11:51
As an attendee of the meeting, I am disappointed to see the Daily Wildcat's coverage of the event. There are several inaccuracies in the Wildcat's report, beginning with a description of the attendees. The meeting included faculty, lecturers, and staff, not just graduate students and teaching assistants. The conclusion of the meeting was NOT to call for a walkout but to raise awareness of the budget cuts, rather than letting cuts continue to be invisible.

Coverage like this only serves to further divide the university community at a time when everyone should be united. I am extremely disappointed and hope that future events in the Wildcat will be reported on more accurately.

Geoff Boyce
Sat Sep 19 2009 02:10
This article is a gross misrepresentation of both the meeting and its outcome. The graduate students, undergrads, faculty and staff that gathered today quite clearly decided *not* to stage a walkout, but rather a "day of action" to include a rally at noon and a series of educational events about the impacts of the budget cuts on the quality and integrity of our university.

What is more, at no point did I state that "a walkout would be a dramatic showing, but it would also be necessary", nor that there is any connection between a climate of fear and the loss of stimulus money in 2012.

The Wildcat ought to be more honest and responsible in its reporting. This is a tense and difficult time for our whole university community. We need to build relationships and open dialogue across campus. Sensationalist conjecture and slipshod reporting help nothing.







log out