The sentencing hearing became a public airing of the rift the case has caused among parents and children connected to May’s
“”The incident has not affected me emotionally,”” the boy said during his victim sentencing statement in court.
The boy said the only negative outcome of the incident and the resulting prosecution is that he cannot attend the dance school.
The boy’s father, who also spoke, disagreed.
“”This has certainly been an ordeal for my family,”” the father said. “”Hopefully no other
boys or their families need to go through what we’ve gone through.””
The father also criticized news media reporting on the case and accused May of “”not accepting accountability for her offense.””
“”Those who would defend her and minimize her offense are out of line,”” the boy’s father said. He said he and his wife “”sincerely believe (May) did something very wrong.””
More than a dozen parents and students from
“”My son Kevin is a member of
“”She has learned, and she has grown,”” Oneto said.
The case stems from a
On
Under the terms of her probation, May is not allowed to be in the presence of boys ages 10 through 17 unless their parents have signed a release saying they are aware of her conviction and will allow their sons to attend her classes.
Otherwise, May is required to have another adult 25 or older present at all times when she teaches dance to boys in that age range.
Judge
Also, May can apply to serve her jail time through monitoring by an electronic ankle bracelet, an option that would allow her to continue working as a dance instructor.
Smith told May that under the terms of her probation, law enforcement officers could conduct checks to see if she is in the presence of boys.
“”In other words, the