TOKYO — On a man-made island in Tokyo Bay, garbage is getting a makeover.
Tons of waste are trucked here daily to a large industrial building. What can’t be recycled is burned and filtered for toxins. The ash is turned into building material, and the heat is converted into electricity — enough to power 55,000 homes.
The process saves landfill space. Air pollution is minimal. The four-year-old firm, Tokyo Waterfront Recycle Power Co., will turn its first profit this year, said PresidentIkuo Onaka. But, he contends, the rewards aren’t purely financial.
“”We’re making a social contribution,”” said Onaka, whose business is one of nine firms operating on Tokyo’s waterfront to reuse the city’s garbage instead of burying it.
These private-sector companies are part of a very public push by Tokyo’s metropolitan government to turn this dense urban area, home to 13 million people, into the world’s most eco-friendly mega-city.
In addition to reducing solid waste, Tokyo over the last few years has unveiled a slew of environmentally conscious initiatives. Those include toughened environmental building standards, cash incentives for residents to install solar panels and a plan for greening the city, including planting half a million trees and converting a 217-acre landfill in Tokyo Bay into a wooded “”sea forest”” park.
This month Tokyo kicked off its most ambitious effort yet: a mandatory program for 1,400 of the area’s factories and office buildings to cut their carbon emissions 25 percent from 2000 levels by the end of 2020. The plan includes a carbon cap-and-trade system, the first ever attempted by a metropolitan area. The mechanism sets limits on emissions and requires those who exceed their quotas to buy pollution rights from those who are under their caps.
Tokyo’s strategy is reminiscent of California’s. The state’s landmark legislation known as AB 32 requires polluters to curb their emissions significantly over the next decade. But while opponents, including large oil refiners, are bankrolling a campaign to stall that effort in the Golden State, Tokyo is hitting the gas.
More than half the world’s population now resides in cities. Metropolitan Tokyo and its surrounding prefectures have about as many people as the entire state of California. The way such teeming places respond to climate change will largely determine whether global warming can be slowed.
“”We recognize our role as big mega-city … to be a leader,”” saidTeruyuki Ohno, director general for climate strategy for Tokyo’s Bureau of the Environment. “”It is because we are capable of doing it that we have the responsibility to do it.””
Some say Tokyo doesn’t have a choice. Endowed with few natural resources, Japan has long been a champion in energy efficiency and clean technology. But the nation is falling short on a commitment to cut greenhouse gases, which it made more than a decade ago, when it hosted the United Nations convention on climate change in Kyoto.
Japan’s federal legislators so far have failed to agree on a cohesive national strategy. Now some local officials, including Tokyo’s maverick governor,Shintaro Ishihara, are taking up the slack.
Ishihara, best known in the U.S. as the author of the controversial book “”The Japan That Can Say No,”” is a conservative with a green streak. His administration banned older diesel trucks from the city’s roads and led Tokyo’s failed effort to win the 2016 Olympics with a pledge to make the city’s Games the most environmentally friendly ever.
While some businesses have grumbled about his administration’s new carbon-cutting plan, others see it as an opportunity.
Masahiro Takeda, manager of sustainability for Mori Building Co., one of Tokyo’s largest commercial developers, said demand is rising for buildings that save energy and lower tenants’ operating costs. Large-scale recycling, greenery, rainwater reuse and waste heat recapture have become standard features in Mori developments.
At Roppongi Hills, a major shopping and office complex built by Mori in the heart of Tokyo, more than one-quarter of the 21-acre site is covered with trees and shrubs — including a rooftop rice paddy. The plants absorb carbon dioxide and lower roof temperatures, which in turn cuts heating and cooling bills.
“”We want to stay internationally competitive,”” Takeda said.
Neighborhoods, too, are pushing for landscaping, to comply with Tokyo regulations enacted in 2001 requiring all new, large commercial buildings to devote at least 20 percent of their surface area to greenery. The effort was pioneered in the neon-lit Shibuya ward, best known for its youth-oriented shopping district, by officials looking to reverse the loss of trees, lawns and gardens to rampant development.
It hasn’t been easy. Rooftop gardens account for less than 0.5 percent of the ward’s green spaces, according toNoriyuki Matsushima, director of Shibuya’s environmental efforts. The total area covered by plants — about 21 percent — is about the same as it was a decade ago.
Still, simply preserving what’s there is a victory, Matsushima said, and essential in combating the so-called heat-island effect. Heat-trapping concrete and asphalt have raised Tokyo’s temperature by about 3 degrees Celsius over the last century, according to the government. Green roofs, along with tree planting and community gardens, are a way to build community support to fight climate change, Matsushima said.
“”It’s a visible environmental policy,”” he said. “”Most of the people of Shibuya expect to have more greenery.””
Tokyo rooftops are also sprouting solar panels. To spur adoption of photovoltaics, the metropolitan government offers its homeowners a subsidy of 100,000 yen (about $1,070) per kilowatt. (A typical system is about four kilowatts.) That comes on top of the federal subsidy of 70,000 yen (about $750) per kilowatt. The metropolitan government is also offering solar incentives to businesses.
Meanwhile, garbage is getting an afterlife. Tough recycling laws over the years have produced results such as a 99 percent reuse rate for asphalt and concrete and 72 percent for paper. What isn’t recovered is incinerated and the residue buried. But with landfill space in short supply, the metropolitan government in 2006 launched an initiative known as Tokyo Super Eco Town to take recycling to the next level.
Built on the site of a former garbage dump in Tokyo Bay, the project is home to Tokyo Waterfront Recycle Power Co. and eight other private companies, including one that treats toxic chemicals known as PCBs, or polychlorinated biphenyls, and another that converts the city’s food waste into animal feed.
Such efforts have attracted some big-name attention. Rock starBonostopped by in 2008 to plant a tree in nearby Umi-no-Mori, a wooded waterfront park that’s also rising on the former landfill.
But not everyone is impressed. Environmental activists have severely criticized Tokyo’s administration for supporting housing on Minamiyama, a forested mountain near Tokyo whose trees are being felled by developers. And places such as Aichi prefecture, home of the city of Nagoya, have been much more aggressive in their solar efforts.
Still, Tokyo is well ahead of other major cities on a variety of environmental issues. Environmentalists are particularly enthusiastic about the government’s willingness to push ahead with its cap-and-trade program in the midst of a sluggish global economy.
“”Tokyo is the first metropolitan area in the world to try this,”” said Tetsunari Iida, executive director of the nonprofit Institute for Sustainable Energy Policies in Tokyo. “”They want to show it can work.””